[CFUW 76] Wolf Post

[cfuw_shepherd]

Make with the wolfing.

Comments

Re: [lol vore, part 2!]

[babesinthewoods.livejournal.com]

Oh. Maybe... but it was too late for them anyway.

Re: [lol vore, part 2!]

[speak-no-evil.livejournal.com]

Yes. Still, confusing. So good.

Re: [lol vore, part 2!]

[babesinthewoods.livejournal.com]

Yes, it's good for us.

Re: [lol vore, part 2!]

[speak-no-evil.livejournal.com]

Yes.

Hope I'm doing okay. It's hard, to be . . . only helpful enough.

Re: [lol vore, part 2!]

[babesinthewoods.livejournal.com]

I'm probably being too aggressive!

Re: [lol vore, part 2!]

[speak-no-evil.livejournal.com]

Think you're okay? But I've . . . been distracted. So.

--oh. Post closed. So we eat Sara and Shirley.

Re: [lol vore, part 2!]

[babesinthewoods.livejournal.com]

Oh good.


And yes, we really should.

Re: [lol vore, part 2!]

[speak-no-evil.livejournal.com]

Shepherd's checking. (http://cfuw-shepherd.livejournal.com/27389.html?thread=3354109#t3354109)

Re: [lol vore, part 2!]

[tobethemiracle.livejournal.com]

Ringo, so you know. This (http://community.livejournal.com/cryfuckuwolf/220734.html?thread=25488958#t25488958) refers to the very latest last game. Emiri and I were the vocal sheep.

We may have a problem in that he's going to wonder why I'm not so loud this round, but I think I can argue that along the lines of that I was vocal and then was eaten first day and I'm not stupid enough to make the same mistake twice.

I thought you should know anyway.

Re: [lol vore, part 2!]

[speak-no-evil.livejournal.com]

Same for me, first game. Could be . . . useful, or bad.

Re: [lol vore, part 2!]

[tobethemiracle.livejournal.com]

Yeah. He also is ... kinda petty. So it's possible that he'll vote for us just because he wants to get back at me, but I hope his partner assures him that that's a really dumb move.

Re: [lol vore, part 2!]

[speak-no-evil.livejournal.com]

Stupid reason. Could help you, though? Last game . . . only knew one person. He didn't like someone else. Voted on just that. So I thought he was the wolf. Wasn't, but . . .

Re: [lol vore, part 2!]

[tobethemiracle.livejournal.com]

It could show a pattern. I like your thinking, Cass.

Re: [lol vore, part 2!]

[speak-no-evil.livejournal.com]

Yes. Or look suspicious, at least.

Re: [lol vore, part 2!]

[tobethemiracle.livejournal.com]

You're good at reading people.

Re: [lol vore, part 2!]

[speak-no-evil.livejournal.com]

Better, outside the game. And kept guessing wrong, last game.

Re: [lol vore, part 2!]

[babesinthewoods.livejournal.com]

Well.... I know you can't be vocal now to throw them off, but... would it be to much like lying for you to warn me about that, in our post? I've been kind of pushy, so that could be your reason for bringing it up. And if you say it somewhere officially people might believe it more later?

Re: [lol vore, part 2!]

[tobethemiracle.livejournal.com]

Not really. Pushy sheep do get eaten. It'd be lying if I said that we were sheep, but if I put it in two sentences, they're unrelated. People can make inferences between the two if they like but I know and you know they're separate ideas.

And done.

Re: [lol vore, part 2!]

[babesinthewoods.livejournal.com]

Maybe this won't be so hard...

Re: [lol vore, part 2!]

[tobethemiracle.livejournal.com]

It wouldn't be fun if it weren't a challenge, right?