Game 80: Wolves

[cfuw_shepherd]

These are the wolves . . . hello.

Don't worry. You don't actually have to eat people. Maybe . . . oh. Sorry.

Comments

[gothrumefirst]

Sweet! Here's to hoping then! I've never been in a game where the wolves won yet... ehe.

[silent-crown.livejournal.com]

. . . Yes.

[sparklybite.livejournal.com]

Then your side's never lost!

[gothrumefirst]

Haha, well I don't intend for it to start now! Adachi Emiri plays to WIN!

[sparklybite.livejournal.com]

According to one of her questions, there may be no safe sheep this game.

[gothrumefirst]

Eh? Isn't that impossible? After the third day, if you eliminate the first two suspects in a three person clue, the last person remaining is either a definite sheep or definite wolf, since the shepherd has to give a warning if it's the last round. Unless we get a three-person clue in tomorrow's round and not today's... well, in any case, it doesn't matter much to us. The less people for the sheep to trust, the better. And having a safe sheep pretty much dictates who we should to eat, so it's a bother if we want to eat someone else.

[sparklybite.livejournal.com]

It may mean they're not getting a clue!

[gothrumefirst]

Hmmmm. We'll see for now, it's still a little too early to tell.

[gothrumefirst]

Oh, by the way, I set up a fake "locked" post for us to talk in here, if you want! Umm, Serph-- that's your name, right? I can do one to you too, if you want, but I don't want to create more work for us than is actually necessary. I've created posts to three other sheep as well, under the guise that "Well, if I create locked posts to four people, ONE of them has to be a sheep, logically speaking, right?" mostly because I'm way too tired now to created locked posts to everyone. Etc etc.

[gothrumefirst]

Oh hey also, I think the shepherd implied in a comment to Sheryl over here that the special person or whatever may be able to work with us, if we find them first! That could be an advantage to us...