cfuw_shepherd ([personal profile] cfuw_shepherd) wrote2008-12-16 03:32 pm

CRY FUCK YOUR KIDNEYS WOLF POST

THIS IS THE WOLF POST

Everyone contribute $15 which will go toward refreshments which will be served at a later point.

[identity profile] sharpasfire.livejournal.com 2008-12-18 09:21 am (UTC)(link)
I would suggest you offer what you think they want to hear. If they ask specifically about us then feel free to give them your opinion, but don't offer it randomly. The best cover is not associating any of us together.

It's also why I suggest, if you are put up for ousting, Dexter's team and ours should divide our votes. One for and one against. If you go down you may take one with us but the other one will have some defense. And if we cast our votes early there's always the chance the sheep will rush in and do something stupid out of haste.

As for that idea, it would work. Most of the players here assume everyone except for the worthless team knows their role since that's what the Shepherd implied. But if anyone should be accused of having divided loyalties it's that team.

[identity profile] captaincy.livejournal.com 2008-12-18 09:34 am (UTC)(link)
I think that's a good idea, the divided voting; and as soon as possible, too, waiting around to agree with what the majority thinks can look kinda suspicious.

On that note, are either of your guys keeping a private post with your partner? Last game I played in a lot of suspicion was cleared when teams being ousted opened up their communication with their partner, and Rose and I haven't been around much, but ours is squeaky-clean.

[identity profile] sharpasfire.livejournal.com 2008-12-18 09:44 am (UTC)(link)
Ty Lee opened up one that we've barely spoken, but it looks perfectly innocent. And we'll continue the charade for the game.

Depending on the context of our conversation we'll throw a suspicion vote tomorrow on either team. I'm leaning toward Yukari's since she's been around for all of one comment. Then depending on who goes up from that we'll argue the appropriate amount of suspicion toward your team.

[identity profile] captaincy.livejournal.com 2008-12-18 09:53 am (UTC)(link)
Sounds good to me. Obviously I'd prefer not to go up at all, but if Rose and I are gonna get voted out I'd want it to work in all our favour. I know Stein and Medusa still think the first team were most likely wolves.

[identity profile] life-inplastic.livejournal.com 2008-12-18 09:51 am (UTC)(link)
An immediate vote each might link us together too much. We need to vote soon, but not right away.

I've got a post with Deb, of course.

[identity profile] sharpasfire.livejournal.com 2008-12-18 09:56 am (UTC)(link)
Not immediate, but in the ousting it would be good if at least one of us voted early. Sheep tend to want to even things out, and with the prospect of cutting down the useless team's probability if it's tied they might be willing to risk it.

Besides, I like taking initiative.

[identity profile] life-inplastic.livejournal.com 2008-12-18 11:01 am (UTC)(link)
Judging by last vote, people are reluctant to vote out the less useful people just for being less useful. I'm gonna try steer people towards Takano. Practically asking to be in a clue and then using that clue as evidence sounds pretty suspicious to me.