cfuw_shepherd | CFUW 136

CFUW 136 - Wolves

[You find you have access to a private side room. There's a large table with chairs around it and complimentary bottles of water. It's nice enough otherwise, but not very interesting. Still, you should be able to get some work done here.]

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

Exactly.

And in the ousting, it'd be "I flipped a coin".

Yes.

There won't be a discernible pattern until later, I suppose.

Who is your team going to vote for?

Probably Satoshi's team.

It will look suspicious if we vote on the same team, right?

That depends on how the others vote. If we were the only two to vote on his team it would be suspicious. Right now, we should figure out who is voting for who.

So if the votes fall only on your team and Satoshi's team, would it look suspicious for my team to vote on Rika?

No, I do not think so.

There would be no issue with that now, I think--you're all tied at one vote per team.

When will you vote?

Soon. I want to talk to Rika first. As well as Satoshi.

I spoke to Rika and Satoshi's partner already. I'll cast my vote towards the end like I usually do as my partner is not around at the moment.

[ nods ] That is a smart decision.

I can try to make it look like I'm evening out the votes like I did last time. Is it risky to vote on your team later? I mean, if it's clear that you're one of the teams going up later and our one vote can't change that.

No, I do not think it is risky.

What if people ask why we changed our votes between the suspicion poll and the ousting poll?

That is when you give a solid reason that cannot be refuted.

. . . That's the harder part.

It should be fine as long as no one can question it.

Rika's in the lead in the polls right now.

So we have a choice of Accelerator's team, Parker's team and Lambda's team to choose from if we're talking about eating active teams or particularly sharp mentors.

I see that.

I do not know Parker and Lamdba. What do you think about them?

Lambda will be very active according to what I've seen. Parker was more active in the later stages of the last game. Both of them are sharper than they appear and not what they seem to be.

Then it would be smart to keep them guessing as to who the wolves are for certain. We cannot make any slip ups around them.

[ has been listening in ] I'm close to Parker. That could make eating her either a very good or a very bad decision.

(no subject)

pussyfortono - 2012-02-11 02:49 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

runstowardsfire - 2012-02-11 02:49 (UTC) - Expand

Yes, that's true. Parker picks up on careless slips and Lambda knows me. Keeping Rika and Lambda in the game is a little chancy as they both know me, but Rika is in a clue, so wolves naturally have a reason to keep her in if she doesn't get ousted.

So Accelerator's team?