cfuw_shepherd ([personal profile] cfuw_shepherd) wrote2006-05-25 01:19 am

Game 27.

Discuss who you're gonna eat here.

[identity profile] onsen-addict.livejournal.com 2006-05-25 03:22 am (UTC)(link)
Right. Near the end of this round or the beginning of the next is when we usually start. If we scapegoat him - well. I don't think I can do that since I have just as much reason to want her out as he does. He could turn it back on me. And yeah, the eating vote.

It's probably best to just go along with it and hope Fllay can get enough sheep on her side. If either of us vote to keep her in the game it'll look too suspicious.

[identity profile] the-wildcat.livejournal.com 2006-05-25 03:28 am (UTC)(link)
I definitely can't vote to keep 'er in. Ergh--we can't eat 'im, he'll be SO MAD--I wanna keep 'im in as long as we can, he likes playin'! He says he's not gonna do a lot this time. We gotta eat someone else!

Does what the shepherd said mean that George 'n' Glinda are safe sheep?

[identity profile] onsen-addict.livejournal.com 2006-05-25 03:34 am (UTC)(link)
I guess we could. We can just pick a name out of a hat if no one comes forward with the clue.

They said it wasn't a clue, so I don't think so. It's probably a hint to decipher the clue that the sheep got.