We're going to have to. Because your story is that you "know" you're a sheep, so one of those two have to be the wolf. Better odds, when you think about it. It'd be strange for you to go off to someone else when to you, it'd be fifty-fifty.
Talk with people and see what they say -- I'd say be equally suspicious of Qiao and Sano. Come up with a story and stick to it. The problem that you might run into is that people will want to know why you voted when everyone else abstained, and if the clue really pointed to Kodachi or Qiao. Because while Ranma or I could easily say that we think it meant Kodachi, you ... were the one who ousted her, technically.
--or, wait. With the clue -- maybe you could argue that it might've pointed to Saya? Since I hear she has a partner and they do everything together, so ... "twins."
... man, this is complicated. I think our safest bet would be to get Qiao and Sano up and oust Qiao first.
Well, when I voted I voted for Kodachi because I just didn't know her. And the clue was later said to be wrong, so maybe it meant not to trust her or that she wasn't it. It was too broad a clue.
Saya's got a partner, Yuma. But I dunno if you could call them twins.
But yeah, we can definitely work on Qiao tonight. I'm going to go ahead and move my vote like I told Tomo I would.
no subject
I know Larxene and she's really creepy and SMART. Plus since we don't really get along, that would be my natural choice if I'm not sure, right?
I was thinking earlier that since Ranma and I talked so much in the game post, that we should fake a post in one of our journals.
no subject
Larxene ... hmm. It seems kind of suspicious to focus on someone outside of the clue, though. But it might come in handy. Just be careful with that.
That'd be a good idea. I'm going to make a few in a bit to the people in that clue, so we'll need to fake one.
no subject
If I don't move it to her, do you want to focus on either Qiao or Sano, since they're also in the clue?
Okay, that's fine.
no subject
Talk with people and see what they say -- I'd say be equally suspicious of Qiao and Sano. Come up with a story and stick to it. The problem that you might run into is that people will want to know why you voted when everyone else abstained, and if the clue really pointed to Kodachi or Qiao. Because while Ranma or I could easily say that we think it meant Kodachi, you ... were the one who ousted her, technically.
--or, wait. With the clue -- maybe you could argue that it might've pointed to Saya? Since I hear she has a partner and they do everything together, so ... "twins."
... man, this is complicated. I think our safest bet would be to get Qiao and Sano up and oust Qiao first.
no subject
Well, when I voted I voted for Kodachi because I just didn't know her. And the clue was later said to be wrong, so maybe it meant not to trust her or that she wasn't it. It was too broad a clue.
Saya's got a partner, Yuma. But I dunno if you could call them twins.
But yeah, we can definitely work on Qiao tonight. I'm going to go ahead and move my vote like I told Tomo I would.
no subject
Who knows. Like I said earlier, it was a broad clue that could've covered anyone.
I'll leave mine on Sano for now.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
You wanna make the post?
no subject
Ah, yeah. Give me just a minute.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
first fake post ever, what.(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)