cfuw_shepherd ([personal profile] cfuw_shepherd) wrote2006-10-21 12:53 pm

CFUW 37

Hello Clarice.

[identity profile] naughtwitchis.livejournal.com 2006-10-24 01:28 am (UTC)(link)
I missed much of yesterday - it is all right.

Yes, so it seems. Of course, the day after, I will doubtless be voted out, if we manage to remove him today.

[identity profile] done-rare.livejournal.com 2006-10-24 01:36 am (UTC)(link)
Unless the shepherd feels nice enough not to mention we got three wolves left, yeah. I'll try holdin' off voting til it's later in the round. Don't wanna look too eager.

[identity profile] naughtwitchis.livejournal.com 2006-10-24 01:42 am (UTC)(link)
That may happen, if the Ram protects a sheep successfully again. They are supposed to keep it balanced, aren't they? We should therefore try to eat the most obvious person, if I am not voted out. If I am - I would suggest Ryuuken. What more need for him?

[identity profile] naughtwitchis.livejournal.com 2006-10-24 07:53 am (UTC)(link)
. . . then again, perhaps not. If the Shepherd does not say that there are only two wolves remaining, once I am gone, then perhaps Ryuuken will be voted out, under suspicion of being the true wolf of the clue. . . and the Ram may try to protect him, figuring that if I were the wolf, the remaining wolves would try to consume him. And, should that happen, it would confirm that he is a sheep, while he yet remained in the game.

Hm.

[identity profile] done-rare.livejournal.com 2006-10-24 06:40 pm (UTC)(link)
If we're not gonna eat the doc, prob'ly not a good idea to go for Hyatt either. If the shepherd decides to send out another clue and she's gone it could go to the doc.

[identity profile] cfuw-shepherd.livejournal.com 2006-10-24 08:21 pm (UTC)(link)
Good times.

Well, you kids just let me know who you feel like eating before your ousting closes, and we'll see how it goes.