cfuw_shepherd (
cfuw_shepherd) wrote2008-04-12 05:51 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Game 74: Psychiatrist's Office
[this is a small, cozy office with all the regular office trappings, a desk, a potted plant, and so on. one of those fancy long psychiatrist couches! oh, and of course, a coffeemaker with all the fixings]
Hello, gentlemen! ♥
Hello, gentlemen! ♥
no subject
But you know he's not that kind of doctor, right?
no subject
no subject
no subject
I want you to try to drive partners apart. Find out what makes them tick~ and make them question whether or not they really trust each other.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
[is totally downing coffee like candy]
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Coffee?
no subject
We're going to have to try and work things out in advance, just in case one of us doesn't make it to an ousting with enough time. Things change fast in these games, so it won't be perfect and when we do both make it we'll probably change a lot of shit. But just in case, yeah?
no subject
That makes sense. And I'll try my best to be around.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
[TEXT MESSAGES]
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
If they decide that they trust each other, and they're both sheep, they find out your identities, and remain in the game. If one sheep decides that they distrust the other, but the other sheep trusts them, the sheep that has lost trust will be unfortunately removed from the game, and the power of the remaining partner halved—they will either no longer be able to communicate in private, or no longer be able to vote in suspicion polls, only the ousting. If both sheep distrust each other, both are removed from the game. ♥
If you choose to psychoanalyze a wolf team, your identities will also be revealed to them, and it will be their choice whether or not they contact you.
The interesting part~ is if you choose to analyze the one-sheep-one-wolf team. If the sheep partner admits to distrusting the wolf, and the wolf predicts this, the sheep will be brought over to the wolves' side. If the sheep distrusts the wolf, but the wolf thinks the sheep trusts him, the wolf is ousted. And if the sheep trusts the wolf, the sheep dies. ♥
We may play with things a little as we go along, but that's the general idea~ ehe!
no subject
no subject
no subject
When will we find out the identities of the people we've chosen? Before or after we question them. It sounds like this works better the closer we fit our questions to their roles, especially if we catch the split team.
no subject
Mm~ I'm afraid you'll only find out based on the result.
no subject
no subject