cfuw_shepherd ([personal profile] cfuw_shepherd) wrote2008-04-23 10:04 pm

[CFUW 76] Wolf Post

Make with the wolfing.

Re: [lol vore, part 2!]

[identity profile] babesinthewoods.livejournal.com 2008-04-26 03:32 am (UTC)(link)
Oh.... I just saw your comment over mine. Too bad!

Re: [lol vore, part 2!]

[identity profile] speak-no-evil.livejournal.com 2008-04-26 03:33 am (UTC)(link)
It's okay. Why switch?

Re: [lol vore, part 2!]

[identity profile] babesinthewoods.livejournal.com 2008-04-26 03:42 am (UTC)(link)
Because it would have looked like the wolves were trying to keep them from going up, because they're wolves! ...or like the wolves were trying to scapegoat them for Sara-san's team.

It doesn't really matter since Shigure-sempai already went out, but any misinformation we could lay down would give the flock more of a tangle to look through.

Re: [lol vore, part 2!]

[identity profile] speak-no-evil.livejournal.com 2008-04-26 03:50 am (UTC)(link)
Oh. Makes sense.

You're doing good, looks like. Agatsuma says, "I've seen games where wolves are voted out first round, but usually due to meer luck. I agree though, Shigure is quite sly while his partner seems merely eager and new. The boy's protection of his sister seems sincere, so I find it unlikely that the post was made to cast suspicion on her." And Tetsunosuke says, "I think we'll go for Shirley and Sarah. Even if they're not wolves, that post is too strange to completely dismiss. It may be just something to distract us...but, it's what we have for now."

Hour or two ago, in the locked post.

Re: [lol vore, part 2!]

[identity profile] babesinthewoods.livejournal.com 2008-04-26 03:55 am (UTC)(link)
He's really strange... I would never have thought they were trying to use her. It's good that they kept talking about it though. If they never decide who the real wolf in this clue was, they can't analyze other people's votes later.

By the way, I agree we should eat whoever doesn't go out.

Re: [lol vore, part 2!]

[identity profile] speak-no-evil.livejournal.com 2008-04-26 04:02 am (UTC)(link)
Defending a sheep as proof you're sheep. Happens, yes? I wouldn't vote on just that, but . . . --Jinana thinks Shigure.

Okay. Good.

Re: [lol vore, part 2!]

[identity profile] speak-no-evil.livejournal.com 2008-04-26 04:07 am (UTC)(link)
Sorry, if we eat Jinana. But it makes sense.

Re: [lol vore, part 2!]

[identity profile] silent-crown.livejournal.com 2008-04-26 04:36 am (UTC)(link)
It is okay.

Re: [lol vore, part 2!]

[identity profile] speak-no-evil.livejournal.com 2008-04-26 04:39 am (UTC)(link)
And we don't have to. Good.

Re: [lol vore, part 2!]

[identity profile] babesinthewoods.livejournal.com 2008-04-26 04:05 am (UTC)(link)
Oh. Maybe... but it was too late for them anyway.

Re: [lol vore, part 2!]

[identity profile] speak-no-evil.livejournal.com 2008-04-26 04:10 am (UTC)(link)
Yes. Still, confusing. So good.

Re: [lol vore, part 2!]

[identity profile] babesinthewoods.livejournal.com 2008-04-26 04:16 am (UTC)(link)
Yes, it's good for us.

Re: [lol vore, part 2!]

[identity profile] speak-no-evil.livejournal.com 2008-04-26 04:25 am (UTC)(link)
Yes.

Hope I'm doing okay. It's hard, to be . . . only helpful enough.

Re: [lol vore, part 2!]

[identity profile] babesinthewoods.livejournal.com 2008-04-26 04:31 am (UTC)(link)
I'm probably being too aggressive!

Re: [lol vore, part 2!]

[identity profile] speak-no-evil.livejournal.com 2008-04-26 04:36 am (UTC)(link)
Think you're okay? But I've . . . been distracted. So.

--oh. Post closed. So we eat Sara and Shirley.

Re: [lol vore, part 2!]

[identity profile] babesinthewoods.livejournal.com 2008-04-26 04:37 am (UTC)(link)
Oh good.


And yes, we really should.

Re: [lol vore, part 2!]

[identity profile] speak-no-evil.livejournal.com 2008-04-26 04:41 am (UTC)(link)
Shepherd's checking. (http://cfuw-shepherd.livejournal.com/27389.html?thread=3354109#t3354109)

Re: [lol vore, part 2!]

[identity profile] tobethemiracle.livejournal.com 2008-04-26 04:25 am (UTC)(link)
Ringo, so you know. This (http://community.livejournal.com/cryfuckuwolf/220734.html?thread=25488958#t25488958) refers to the very latest last game. Emiri and I were the vocal sheep.

We may have a problem in that he's going to wonder why I'm not so loud this round, but I think I can argue that along the lines of that I was vocal and then was eaten first day and I'm not stupid enough to make the same mistake twice.

I thought you should know anyway.

Re: [lol vore, part 2!]

[identity profile] speak-no-evil.livejournal.com 2008-04-26 04:30 am (UTC)(link)
Same for me, first game. Could be . . . useful, or bad.

Re: [lol vore, part 2!]

[identity profile] tobethemiracle.livejournal.com 2008-04-26 04:32 am (UTC)(link)
Yeah. He also is ... kinda petty. So it's possible that he'll vote for us just because he wants to get back at me, but I hope his partner assures him that that's a really dumb move.

Re: [lol vore, part 2!]

[identity profile] speak-no-evil.livejournal.com 2008-04-26 04:38 am (UTC)(link)
Stupid reason. Could help you, though? Last game . . . only knew one person. He didn't like someone else. Voted on just that. So I thought he was the wolf. Wasn't, but . . .

Re: [lol vore, part 2!]

[identity profile] babesinthewoods.livejournal.com 2008-04-26 04:33 am (UTC)(link)
Well.... I know you can't be vocal now to throw them off, but... would it be to much like lying for you to warn me about that, in our post? I've been kind of pushy, so that could be your reason for bringing it up. And if you say it somewhere officially people might believe it more later?

Re: [lol vore, part 2!]

[identity profile] tobethemiracle.livejournal.com 2008-04-26 04:39 am (UTC)(link)
Not really. Pushy sheep do get eaten. It'd be lying if I said that we were sheep, but if I put it in two sentences, they're unrelated. People can make inferences between the two if they like but I know and you know they're separate ideas.

And done.

Re: [lol vore, part 2!]

[identity profile] babesinthewoods.livejournal.com 2008-04-26 04:42 am (UTC)(link)
Maybe this won't be so hard...