But isn't that a little blatent? For instance, if I accused Ari, and then I died, it would cast suspicion on Ari, but... that's the sort of thing everyone expects automatically, so it never seems to work.
I'd rather kill random targets - or suspicious targets to throw the sheep off. Or even innocents - Alphonse Elric would make a good first victim.
The obvious can be the least expected. Any strategy is a double-edged sword and what you're suggesting is deliberately random choices, which may be even worse since your "random" strategy sounds like it's picking out the more oblivious campers that can be more easily swayed than others.
I've thought of that, too. I may be able to keep Ari convinced, but really, he figured Taro out before me, so I should be very careful around him. Other than that, there aren't many people I know this game.
We could pool a list of people who would trust us easily and work them. For me, I'm fairly sure I could convince Lady Tot of my good intentions, as well as Ari.
It would be a domino effect. If you can find some participants that trust you and are trusted by others you can set up a network of those that will vouch for you.
I'm thinking I may claim Murata Ken has been a victim of scapegoating after a little more time has passed. I'll have to ask Lady Huang if she voted for him first, though.
Then, if he gets voted out, I'm in a better position tomorrow.
Or, of course, one of you could claim this, too, although it's usually my racket to count suspicion votes. It'd be out of character if I *didn't* say anything.
no subject
no subject
Aren't the hardest serial killers to find the ones who have no pattern to their killings? If that isn't a paradox, I mean.
I was thinking we should adopt that as our killing strategy - random killings. No rhyme, no reason, harder to track, right?
no subject
no subject
I suggest making targets out of those that are accusing other campers, one each time, and then picking the others at random.
no subject
I'd rather kill random targets - or suspicious targets to throw the sheep off. Or even innocents - Alphonse Elric would make a good first victim.
no subject
no subject
I've thought of that, too. I may be able to keep Ari convinced, but really, he figured Taro out before me, so I should be very careful around him. Other than that, there aren't many people I know this game.
We could pool a list of people who would trust us easily and work them. For me, I'm fairly sure I could convince Lady Tot of my good intentions, as well as Ari.
no subject
no subject
I may work on Murata some, too.
no subject
You'd have an easier time with this than I would.
no subject
It's still too early to tell with Lady Huang, but I think her focus is tightly on you - I'd wager her suspicion vote went to you.
I may see if I can play good cop to Murata and Ari - his sudden jump in 'popularity' *does* look suspicious.
no subject
... It's very strange. Ying offered something of an explanation, but I'm loath to believe it would just be that.
no subject
I honestly think this is her idea of foreplay.
no subject
... It probably is. Sorry.
no subject
Not that she's not a decent catch, but really, it's... kinda like thinking of your parents' love lives.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
There's got to be a catch. There's no way she'd just go for you with no proof.
She must be biding her time with me, then.
no subject
no subject
no subject
I'll be at a hundred percent no matter how many votes are cast against me.
no subject
no subject
no subject
Then, if he gets voted out, I'm in a better position tomorrow.
Or, of course, one of you could claim this, too, although it's usually my racket to count suspicion votes. It'd be out of character if I *didn't* say anything.
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
Right, right, teamwork! That thing I'm really good at! Eheh.
no subject
Oh wait, I forgot. We're the bad guys. *sulk* Okay, I'm clueless too.