At least we managed to keep Ranma in -- good job with that. I'll comment to the actual post later today, I guess.
You, Qiao, and Sano. The clue was probably supposed to point to Qiao, then? I saw a name almost exactly like hers on the camp roster. ... I think we should go for Sano this round, personally. I've seen him argue with that Ash kid in camp, so him getting eaten this early on could cast suspicion on him. My vote's on him at the moment. Ranma, if you're reading this, wait until later tomorrow to vote, okay? Piling on him now would look suspicious.
I'll make a post to Tomo later when I'm actually awake, lalala to see what she thinks. We could probably get Sano out this round, with a bit of luck and using Ash getting eaten as leverage, but next round'll get tricky because of that first clue that got scrapped.
I'm thinking ... I'll make posts to the others in a bit after I finish errands and wake up, agh. Probably the three in the clue plus Tomo -- we'll need to fake a post, Sora. After I see how that goes and who suspects who, I'll let you know who it'd be best to vote for.
The last thing we want to do, though, is attract attention and make people realize that the three of us are working together.
Gotcha. I can stop workin' with folks easy enough. I'd gamble Quao, though. Don't think anyone really knows her, here, so it might take some bite outta things an give us th'next round.
Yeah, I've been thinking it over. Sano would be good to get out this round, but on the other hand, he'd be a tough sell to Tomo, and it'd probably be easier to sway people tomorrow if we get Qiao out tonight, especially with Ash getting eaten. ... I'm going to keep my vote on Sano for now and talk with Tomo about it. Maybe let her sway me over to Qiao, even, since I'm pretty sure she's on her.
Speaking of eating, I think it'd be best to eat Isuzu tonight. We only have one safe sheep, but three were named in that clue. That leaves you, me, Saya, Larxene, Tomo, and Hyatt as unknowns. If we eat one of the unknowns, another one could possibly get a clue instead of Isuzu that names three more, leaving one of us open and obvious. But, if we eat Isuzu, while the next clue would still go to someone else, it'd be better odds. Three in the clue, and two out.
I'm flexible, though. If things change and we have to eat someone else, I say go for it.
They're that tight, huh? Pretty silly of her in a game like this, but ain't much fer us t'lose in either case.
Hmm. Puttin' it like that, best to take th'horse out back an shoot her get rid of her. Anyone payin attention probably got used t'her bein' a function, so they might get really jumpy tomorrow.
The clue could have pointed to either the Kuno siblings or Qiao... I don't think the shepherd would have picked me out for sure so soon.
I don't think that Tomo'll vote Sano out, even if he was a wolf. In fact, she kinda said that she wouldn't. Also my vote's on her for right now, and she knows it, but I'll move it to either Sano or Larxene later tonight.
I'll probably make a post to either Larxene or Saya later, then.
I'm going to say that I thought it pointed to the Kuno siblings, after seeing Kodachi on the ousting, but that was after the fact, when it was too late to do anything.
I don't think she will either, but I know her vote is the one on Qiao right now. If I can cast suspicion on at least one of the others, it'll help, right? ... or something. Why move it to Larxene?
We're going to have to. Because your story is that you "know" you're a sheep, so one of those two have to be the wolf. Better odds, when you think about it. It'd be strange for you to go off to someone else when to you, it'd be fifty-fifty.
Talk with people and see what they say -- I'd say be equally suspicious of Qiao and Sano. Come up with a story and stick to it. The problem that you might run into is that people will want to know why you voted when everyone else abstained, and if the clue really pointed to Kodachi or Qiao. Because while Ranma or I could easily say that we think it meant Kodachi, you ... were the one who ousted her, technically.
--or, wait. With the clue -- maybe you could argue that it might've pointed to Saya? Since I hear she has a partner and they do everything together, so ... "twins."
... man, this is complicated. I think our safest bet would be to get Qiao and Sano up and oust Qiao first.
Well, when I voted I voted for Kodachi because I just didn't know her. And the clue was later said to be wrong, so maybe it meant not to trust her or that she wasn't it. It was too broad a clue.
Saya's got a partner, Yuma. But I dunno if you could call them twins.
But yeah, we can definitely work on Qiao tonight. I'm going to go ahead and move my vote like I told Tomo I would.
no subject
no subject
no subject
You, Qiao, and Sano. The clue was probably supposed to point to Qiao, then? I saw a name almost exactly like hers on the camp roster. ... I think we should go for Sano this round, personally. I've seen him argue with that Ash kid in camp, so him getting eaten this early on could cast suspicion on him. My vote's on him at the moment. Ranma, if you're reading this, wait until later tomorrow to vote, okay? Piling on him now would look suspicious.
I'll make a post to Tomo later
when I'm actually awake, lalalato see what she thinks. We could probably get Sano out this round, with a bit of luck and using Ash getting eaten as leverage, but next round'll get tricky because of that first clue that got scrapped.no subject
no subject
after I finish errands and wake up, agh. Probably the three in the clue plus Tomo -- we'll need to fake a post, Sora. After I see how that goes and who suspects who, I'll let you know who it'd be best to vote for.The last thing we want to do, though, is attract attention and make people realize that the three of us are working together.
no subject
no subject
Speaking of eating, I think it'd be best to eat Isuzu tonight. We only have one safe sheep, but three were named in that clue. That leaves you, me, Saya, Larxene, Tomo, and Hyatt as unknowns. If we eat one of the unknowns, another one could possibly get a clue instead of Isuzu that names three more, leaving one of us open and obvious. But, if we eat Isuzu, while the next clue would still go to someone else, it'd be better odds. Three in the clue, and two out.
I'm flexible, though. If things change and we have to eat someone else, I say go for it.
no subject
Hmm. Puttin' it like that, best to
take th'horse out back an shoot herget rid of her. Anyone payin attention probably got used t'her bein' a function, so they might get really jumpy tomorrow.no subject
because she actually shares the clues, but if there's no better option, we're going to have to.I'll keep an eye on things. No one's contacted you for any private posts yet, right?
no subject
Not that I'm seein', no.
but thanks for the reminder that I have an ungodly amount of charas to friend |Dno subject
Me neither. Don't worry about starting any up for now, then.
I'm too lazy for that, ahaha. They can just contact me. >(no subject
I don't think that Tomo'll vote Sano out, even if he was a wolf. In fact, she kinda said that she wouldn't. Also my vote's on her for right now, and she knows it, but I'll move it to either Sano or Larxene later tonight.
I'll probably make a post to either Larxene or Saya later, then.
no subject
I don't think she will either, but I know her vote is the one on Qiao right now. If I can cast suspicion on at least one of the others, it'll help, right? ... or something. Why move it to Larxene?
no subject
I know Larxene and she's really creepy and SMART. Plus since we don't really get along, that would be my natural choice if I'm not sure, right?
I was thinking earlier that since Ranma and I talked so much in the game post, that we should fake a post in one of our journals.
no subject
Larxene ... hmm. It seems kind of suspicious to focus on someone outside of the clue, though. But it might come in handy. Just be careful with that.
That'd be a good idea. I'm going to make a few in a bit to the people in that clue, so we'll need to fake one.
no subject
If I don't move it to her, do you want to focus on either Qiao or Sano, since they're also in the clue?
Okay, that's fine.
no subject
Talk with people and see what they say -- I'd say be equally suspicious of Qiao and Sano. Come up with a story and stick to it. The problem that you might run into is that people will want to know why you voted when everyone else abstained, and if the clue really pointed to Kodachi or Qiao. Because while Ranma or I could easily say that we think it meant Kodachi, you ... were the one who ousted her, technically.
--or, wait. With the clue -- maybe you could argue that it might've pointed to Saya? Since I hear she has a partner and they do everything together, so ... "twins."
... man, this is complicated. I think our safest bet would be to get Qiao and Sano up and oust Qiao first.
no subject
Well, when I voted I voted for Kodachi because I just didn't know her. And the clue was later said to be wrong, so maybe it meant not to trust her or that she wasn't it. It was too broad a clue.
Saya's got a partner, Yuma. But I dunno if you could call them twins.
But yeah, we can definitely work on Qiao tonight. I'm going to go ahead and move my vote like I told Tomo I would.
no subject
Who knows. Like I said earlier, it was a broad clue that could've covered anyone.
I'll leave mine on Sano for now.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)